Today we talk about:
- The definition of ecotourism
- The differences between ecotourism and sustainable tourism (why do we confuse them?)
- Hints on how to communicate sustainability in tourism.
The definition of ECOTOURISM
Ecotourism defined by GEN (Global Ecotourism Network) in 2016:
‘Tourism that takes place in natural areas, that conserves the environment (through specific conservation projects for example) supports the local population’s well-being and creates knowledge and understanding through interpretation and education of all those involved: visitors, staff and guests or residents’.
*Small side note on the importance of the sources.
THE ENTIRE Advisory Board of TIES (The International Ecotourism Society) resigned in 2014 due to what they believed to be very serious and severe financial anomalies at TIES. “As a result,” reads GEN’s manifesto, “we subsequently formed GEN in 2015 because we felt that we could not continue to support TIES either ethically or legally”.
I have personally known some members of this original board during my experience of working in Australia. Such a choice, leaving and founding a new group, must have been painful for them, so I believe there can be no better source of information on the subject.
What are the most important characteristics to define an ECOTOURISM activity:
- Carried out in natural areas (often protected areas).
- Linked to a conservation purpose and supports the local population’s well-being (this part would seem to be associated only with poor areas). Instead, it is an excellent tool for any territory, for example with the project Non Solo Lago 2015 -2016 the local products to the region of Valle Albano (protected area in the north of Lake Como) where the link between the tourist activity, the activity of studying the territory for conservation – to be restored and diversification factor for the local economy. The project, unfortunately, came to an end, and the activity did not continue. Still, it demonstrated that a similar approach is possible and economically viable in a relatively short period of time.
- Ecotourism creates knowledge and understanding through interpretation and education.
Differences between ECOTOURISM and SUSTAINABLE TOURISM
Due to its characteristics, ecotourism can be considered a type of tourism.
Sustainable tourism activity can be applied in natural, urban or rural areas as it is an approach.
Ecotourism activity aims to preserve the natural area visited and a positive impact on the local community.
The sustainable approach to tourism aims to consider the present and future economic, social, and environmental impact on the area by meeting visitors’ needs, the tourism industry, the environment, and especially host communities in the long term.
The confusion arises from the fact that both are a positive way of doing tourism. Still, we forget that sustainable tourism is an approach and can be applied to various tourism and contexts. At the same time, ecotourism has a specific purpose and can occur in nature.
Understanding this difference is important above all to not give our guests wrong indications (who might look for the natural area where the proposed activities take place as ecotourism). Still, also when thinking about some formal project or context (e.g. having to apply for funds) for one or the other, we should know the difference well.
How to communicate sustainability in tourism
In short, if we want to talk about ecotourism, we should always do so about the natural area where the activity takes place and all the time links the action to the conservation purpose we wish to promote. On the other hand, if we want to communicate how sustainable our activity is, we should first specify which area we consider in terms of the environment, society and the economy. We should indicate what steps we want to take, have taken, or achieve our objective.
To move from theory to practice, the following table compares real-world examples of tourism initiatives across Italy and international contexts.
Each case is assessed against a stricter criterion: does it actively and demonstrably contribute to conservation?
This distinction is essential, as the term ecotourism is often used loosely to describe nature-based or low-impact experiences that do not necessarily support environmental protection.
The aim is not only to showcase relevant examples, but to help identify different levels of alignment with ecotourism in its most rigorous sense.
Conservation Levels:
- Level 1: Awareness / impact reduction (not sufficient alone)
- Level 2: Indirect or systemic conservation (communities, resource management)
- Level 3: Direct conservation (biodiversity, habitats, scientific research)
| Case | Model | Type of Conservation | Level* | Evidence of Conservation | B2B Replicability | Critical Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salina Isola Verde | Destination (island) | Operational (water, energy, waste) | 2 | Resource management in a fragile ecosystem | Medium (requires destination governance) | Not focused on specific biodiversity conservation |
| Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso | Protected area | Direct (wildlife, habitats) | 3 | Species protection (e.g. Alpine ibex), visitor regulation | High (replicable in protected areas) | Tourism strictly regulated → limited operator flexibility |
| Val di Fiemme | Forest-based destination | Structured (certified forest management) | 2–3 | FSC/PEFC certifications, ecosystem management | Medium–high | Conservation not always directly linked to tourism products |
| G Adventures | Tour operator | Systemic (communities + environment) | 2–3 | Projects with Planeterra | High (scalable, partnership-based) | Impact depends on individual project quality |
| Inkaterra | Ecolodge | Direct (biodiversity, research) | 3 | Habitat protection, scientific research | Medium (high investment required) | Hard to scale widely |
| Basecamp Explorer | Remote hospitality | Operational + educational | 2 | Impact minimization, climate education | Medium | Less focused on scientific conservation |
Insight
- Only a few cases (e.g. Inkaterra, Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso) represent “core” ecotourism
- Many Italian examples are “in transition” toward ecotourism
- The real distinguishing factor is not the nature-based experience itself, but the active contribution to conservation
The table provides a comparative overview of selected ecotourism cases.
The following section will now examine each example in more detail, highlighting the specific conservation mechanisms, the role of tourism operators, and the level of alignment with ecotourism principles.
This deeper analysis helps move beyond classification, offering a clearer understanding of how different models translate ecotourism principles into practice.
Salina Isola Verde
Model: Island-wide sustainability initiative
Positioning: Destination-level approach to ecotourism
Conservation contribution:
- Integrated management of water, energy, and waste
- Reduction of tourism pressure on a fragile island ecosystem.
Insight: Relevant for DMOs working on systemic sustainability, though conservation remains mostly operational rather than biodiversity-driven.
Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso
Model: Tourism within a protected area
Positioning: Conservation-led tourism
Conservation contribution:
- Direct protection of species and habitats
- Visitor management and regulated access
- Structured environmental education
Insight: A clear example where tourism is subordinated to conservation, not the other way around.
Val di Fiemme
Model: Forest-based destination with certified management
Positioning: Ecosystem-driven local economy
Conservation contribution:
- FSC/PEFC-certified forest management
- Long-term ecosystem preservation linked to local economy
Insight: Strong example of systemic conservation, though not always directly embedded in tourism products.
G Adventures
Model: Global tour operator with community-based projects
Positioning: Scalable responsible tourism
Conservation contribution:
- Community tourism initiatives via Planeterra
- Alternative livelihoods reducing pressure on natural resources
Insight: Demonstrates how to scale impact through partnerships, though consistency varies by project.
Inkaterra
Model: Ecolodge integrated with conservation and research
Positioning: High-end ecotourism
Conservation contribution:
- Biodiversity research programs
- Habitat protection and species monitoring
- Tourism revenues directly funding conservation
Insight: Benchmark for “true ecotourism”, where conservation is a core business function.
Basecamp Explorer
Model: Remote, low-impact hospitality
Positioning: Tourism in fragile ecosystems (Arctic, remote regions)
Conservation contribution:
- Minimization of environmental footprint
- Strong focus on climate and environmental education
Insight: Relevant for operators in high-sensitivity environments, though conservation is more operational than research-based.
Not all nature-based tourism qualifies as ecotourism.
The defining factor is a clear, active, and demonstrable contribution to conservation — not just low impact.
I hope you enjoyed this article! Are you interested in this topic?
Please share your opinion with me!
Sara
Would you like to subscribe to my newsletter? In English, I am using the LinkedIn newsletter. I want to use it because I can learn more about who has subscribed from the LinkedIn profile. Here is the link: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7107445901593313280/
Would you like to join the community newsletter, too? Now you can! From April 2026, I will write in both Italian and English.
Sign up here: https://dashboard.mailerlite.com/forms/414805/95406504960591215/share
The Community newsletter is a private newsletter that brings to subscribers (many friends, colleagues, ex collaborators, new potential ones, clients and so on) topics and information such as:
news from my personal contacts (such as newsletters)
calls for proposals
industry events – even if I don’t attend
research and tools I’ve found or tried.